Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Thema: Sokker Tools by Geston
No problem, take your time, you are doing great job for community as well as Juytt who had also built a similar tool years ago now for french users.
It is working now for Firexof browser!
Ctrl + F5 to realod files.
Show me your graphs! :)
Ctrl + F5 to realod files.
Show me your graphs! :)
Great Geston !! Thx a lot !
A talent 3.20-3.26, that sounds really nice :-)
A talent 3.20-3.26, that sounds really nice :-)
Another small fix and update.
If chart takes data from json it shows also predicted progress until junior gets out from academy!
If chart takes data from json it shows also predicted progress until junior gets out from academy!
That sounds great but i tested in Firefox, it did not work. I only see data till now, not future data as you showed in previous picture above.
Im going to put threshold to min and max talent. 3.0 is going to be the max (best).
@ed
You could use that "upload graph" button :)
(Edith war hier)
@ed
You could use that "upload graph" button :)
(Edith war hier)
idea for estimation you can predict the worst, best and case scenario for the next pop-up limit with max possible increase decrease
formula to do that you add +2 increase as next week and -2 increase for next week and that gives possibility that will help people to give or not give chnace on a user if next week is not making big diffeance so its safe to sack him ..
formula to do that you add +2 increase as next week and -2 increase for next week and that gives possibility that will help people to give or not give chnace on a user if next week is not making big diffeance so its safe to sack him ..
Im going to put threshold to min and max talent. 3.0 is going to be the max (best).
+1. But what’s for min ? 5.0 ?
Another thing, again :
without a regression coefficient we can’t give a clue on reliability of the result. It is unfortunately very misleading to give a talent result with a coefficient under 0.9
+1. But what’s for min ? 5.0 ?
Another thing, again :
without a regression coefficient we can’t give a clue on reliability of the result. It is unfortunately very misleading to give a talent result with a coefficient under 0.9
definitely not 5.0, you can max the number at 20 or 30, or just write "very bad" at infinity and if it is less but still a lot like e.g. 30 then just write 30, it's safer
also, You can do some adjustments in case of first one or even two or three weeks being far above possible maximum
like here
he started at 9 while it's obvious that starting max is 7.00-7.99 (I would assume it's 7.2 as 40%), so linear regression might base on the following weeks and just create the line so it would cross (0, 7.2)
Or maybe not because excluding that first point might change the regression line a lot (?), but might do something else, maybe just adapt the line at the end only with the assumption that starting max i 7.99 (so here You wouldnt have to change anything in such case, but I am just saying about weird cases which might be less weird if the approximation would be also based on some of known assumptions)
(Edith war hier)
also, You can do some adjustments in case of first one or even two or three weeks being far above possible maximum
like here
he started at 9 while it's obvious that starting max is 7.00-7.99 (I would assume it's 7.2 as 40%), so linear regression might base on the following weeks and just create the line so it would cross (0, 7.2)
Or maybe not because excluding that first point might change the regression line a lot (?), but might do something else, maybe just adapt the line at the end only with the assumption that starting max i 7.99 (so here You wouldnt have to change anything in such case, but I am just saying about weird cases which might be less weird if the approximation would be also based on some of known assumptions)
(Edith war hier)
definitely not 5.0, you can max the number at 20 or 30, or just write "very bad"
I was talking about min talent (not max value). 5.0 it’s already “very bad” i think (?) so it should be max value at 5, but I was asking if a min talent was observable (before coach level errors) like max talent 3.0
I was talking about min talent (not max value). 5.0 it’s already “very bad” i think (?) so it should be max value at 5, but I was asking if a min talent was observable (before coach level errors) like max talent 3.0
he started at 9 while it's obvious that starting max is 7.00-7.99 (I would assume it's 7.2 as 40%), so linear regression might base on the following weeks and just create the line so it would cross (0, 7.2)
It seems that adjusted progress is round to higher integer, but it should be round to lower integer (it’s how it’s work in sokker). There is a mistake in adjusted graph since the trend line and initial point is correct (7.5 at w.0) according to linear reg.
(Edith war hier)
It seems that adjusted progress is round to higher integer, but it should be round to lower integer (it’s how it’s work in sokker). There is a mistake in adjusted graph since the trend line and initial point is correct (7.5 at w.0) according to linear reg.
(Edith war hier)